I am contrasting Coaches Roy Williams and George Karl, both 1960s North Carolina Tar Heel Basketball Teammates. What I'd speak of Roy Williams, and knowing a lot of his basketball personally, is he has a knack for recruiting rivals turfs like their his. What I'd speak of George Karl is his inability to stop the Pyramid of Success Mr. John Wooden set in the 1960s and not being able to do enough defense to stop Michael Jordan in the 1990s.
North Carolina's Chapel Hill supremacy of Clemson in Men's Basketball still has continued under Roy Williams in spite of recent scares to the system. George Karl's legacy has been taken down pegs over uncoachable or notoriously disaccountable players.
George Karl's other soft spot is not stopping trades from happening in spite of his repeated insistences. Roy Williams not being able to stop Rome from burning in Chapel Hill over academic fraud and North Carolina disappearing into the Southeast without Dean Smith.
I'd feel where is the tangible pro legacy in coaching that is there now? That is my big multizillion dollar question in the end
No comments:
Post a Comment