What Would Have Happened Differently if Notre Dame took Nebraska's Place in the Big Ten in 2010?

 I would feel guilty even now, if what would happen differently if Notre Dame took Nebraska's Place in the Big Ten in 2010? For starters, it would deter the Missouri's, Rutgers's, Maryland's and Others from being in it for themselves.

We would have had a 1-1 Big East Brand Split Upset College Sports, and we would never have had the privilege of Temple being a Full Conference Champion. If I was Commissioner, I wouldn't have been just mad at someone else's decision making and insert myself into power.

The Mountain West would have had Houston, SMU, Rice, and TCU intact, and the WAC would have not existed altogether. Instead, it would have been a Whole Independent Scene College Football had to put themselves through.

In the Pac 12, in lieu of Utah and Colorado, we would have had Boise State and Hawaii. It would have redone some of your Championship Games, and a lot of the North Division would have been Boise State and Oregon and after a while, it would have been Oregon and it would have not Split the California Schools.

In Big XII Territory, we'd have Too Much Briles, and Missouri would have had trophies in the room for Conference a lot sooner. I'd think and believe that too much Art Briles would have dented Oklahoma's Potential National Championship Tally.

Instead of Leaders and Legends, we would have had Notre Dame do 5 out of the 11 Conference Championship Games, and I'd think that a lot of things would have been different, namely having a Conference Realignment Day like in 2003 (We didn't have that) and the 11 that came in to Division IA Fold would have backfilled Conference USA and the Sun Belt.

I don't think we would have had a Independent East or Independent West, but, it would have been harder for New Mexico State to get their Bowl Later. Not everyone would have liked it, and it would have tore up the map a lot sooner and more expensively again.